Tuesday 22 October 2013

New article: Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions

The new article published in Ecology Letters aims at facilitating the use of Species distribution models (SDMs) in decision making and conservation. This article has been magnificently led by Antoine Guisan (Univ. Genève) and is derived from a series of workshops hosted by CEED on this topic and held in Melbourne and Brisbane (Australia) during 2011 and 2012.

SDMs are increasingly proposed to support conservation decision making. However, evidence of SDMs supporting solutions for on-ground conservation problems is still scarce in the scientific literature. Here, we show that successful examples exist but are still largely hidden in the grey literature, and thus less accessible for analysis and learning. Furthermore, the decision framework within which SDMs are used is rarely made explicit.

Using case studies from biological invasions, identification of critical habitats, reserve selection and translocation of endangered species, we propose that SDMs may be tailored to suit a range of decision-making contexts when used within a structured and transparent decision-making process.

To construct appropriate SDMs to more effectively guide conservation actions, modellers need to better understand the decision process, and decision makers need to provide feedback to modellers regarding the actual use of SDMs to support conservation decisions. This could be facilitated by individuals or institutions playing the role of ‘translators’ between modellers and decision makers.

We encourage species distribution modellers to get involved in real decision-making processes that will benefit from their technical input; this strategy has the potential to better bridge theory and practice, and contribute to improve both scientific knowledge and conservation outcomes.

Guisan et al. 2013. Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions. Ecology Letters in press.

Ecoland participation in the workshops has been provided by the Catalan Government (BE grants, and CARTOBIO) and the SCALES project.

3 comments:

Unknown said...





We had an extensive debate on the same on the ITSkeptic blog on whether the‘
Supporting Services’should be called IT Services or not.
I supported the landscape of‘Supporting services’be built-in in‘IT Services’.
But tiresome to classify the‘IT Service’gives me broaden opinion such as.

Lab IT services OC
Lab IT Services LA
Lab IT services Los Angeles
Lab IT services Orange County
Lab Computer services LA
Lab computer Services OC
Lab computer Services Orange County
Lab computer Services Los Angeles



Anonymous said...

Your blogs and its stuff are so notable and worthwhile it can make me return.

Krain Advantage Website

Anonymous said...

I have been really impressed by going through this awesome blog. Look for WFO Pres

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner